 |
Summary
Objective/goals
Target audience
Work progress
Contractors and Subcontractors
|
| Summary |
Privately constructed solar thermal buildings will
become common as the technology evolves. They
will be built in the same area with conventional buildings,
giving the effect of lower density to a district energy
(DE) utility and having a negative impact on its payback
on capital investment.
The challenge is: "How can
district energy supply an interface to
privately funded small/medium scale solar
thermal systems with net billing for
the benefit of both parties and to minimize
fossil fuel consumption and peak loads
on the network?"
|
| Objective/goals |
- To develop DE system-level design guidelines and methodologies for
cost-effective integration of solar buildings by merging benefits of
centralized and decentralized energy generation and storage.
- To develop methodologies to estimate the optimum
percentage and configurations of solar buildings
to maintain utility stability and cost effectiveness
in areas remote from a central DE plant.
- Using experimental data from a house with a
high-temperature solar system, to develop a bidirectional,
net billing interface. To evaluate control
system interactions and establish guidelines for
efficient system-level operation.
|
| Target audience |
Target audience: This information
will be useful to the solar design industry and DE
engineers in any northern country doing planning for
system expansion. It will also be of interest
to government energy policy officials who will be
defining building standards and incentive programs
to minimize fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse
gas emissions.
General benefits: By using
large scale storage together with solar input the
renewable component of DE energy will be maximized,
since surplus solar energy will be saved for later
use. Any country with a DE industry and a significant
number of solar buildings under planning or construction
will benefit from the guidelines produced by this
project.
|
| Work progress |
Start: November 2008
Estimated date of conclusion: May 2011
|
Contractors &
subcontractors |
- Gagest Inc.
- Benny Thomsen Kamstrup
A/S
- Lisa Aalto, Aalto Inc.
|
 |
 |